NNoo - Exo - The realy trilogy star wars web page standby

Fermi-Paradoxon aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie : nd-andy Lübeck. Follow me:

The full screen is possible:
Youtube Video: Hamradio from the Antarctica area:



Youtube Video. Hamradio from the Antarctica area.
The full screen is possible.







Fermi-Paradoxon aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie : nd-andy Lübeck. Follow me:


de: NASA gibt allen Menschen mit Eliens viel zu tun, aber das Thema gibt es immer, aber die NASA weiß das nicht. Es basiert auf dem Fermi-Paradoxon: Wenn Eliens existieren? Wo sind sie denn dann, dann denn(?) und wieso hat die zuvor noch keiner gesehen? By nd-andy

en: NASA gives all people much to-do whis eliens, but the topic is always, but NASA don't know. It is basically of the Fermi paradox: If aliens exist where are they than then, then than? And why did seen they never before? By nd-andy


Der Sensenmann der Tod. The thanthenmen the death:

Der Sensenmann der Tod. The thanthenmen the death.

==============================================


In English text at the bottom half:

de: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fermi-Paradoxon&oldid=81863153&printable=yes

Fermi-Paradoxon
aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Achtung Dies ist eine alte Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 23. November 2010 um 22:42 Uhr durch 79.201.196.74 (Diskussion). Sie kann sich erheblich von der aktuellen Version unterscheiden.
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Eine markierte Version dieser Seite, die am 24. November 2010 freigegeben wurde, basiert auf dieser Version.

Das Fermi-Paradoxon ist ein Widerspruch, den der Physiker Enrico Fermi 1950 aufzeigte. Das Paradoxon hinterfragt die Wahrscheinlichkeit außerirdischen, intelligenten Lebens. Es versucht, eine grundlegende Frage zu beantworten: „Sind wir Menschen die einzige technologisch fortschrittliche Zivilisation im Universum?“.

Aufgrund des Alters des Universums und seiner hohen Anzahl Sterne sollte Leben auch außerhalb der Erde verbreitet sein, vorausgesetzt die Entstehung des Leben auf Erden wäre kein ungewöhnlicher Vorgang. [1] Enrico Fermi fragte 1950 bei einer informellen Diskussion, warum dann weder Raumschiffe anderer Weltraumbewohner noch von denen abgesandte Von-Neumann-Sonden zu beobachten seien. Eine detaillierte wissenschaftliche Betrachtung des Problems begann in den 70er Jahren mit Studien Michael H. Harts [2], weswegen auch der Ausdruck Fermi-Hart-Paradoxon verwendet wird.[3]
Inhaltsverzeichnis
[Verbergen]

* 1 Grundlegende Überlegung
* 2 Prinzipielle Argumente
o 2.1 Die Hypothese der ungewöhnlichen Erde / Wir sind tatsächlich alleine
o 2.2 Unmöglichkeit interstellarer Kolonisation / Kommunikation
o 2.3 Verteilungsmuster / Zivilisatorische Diffusion
* 3 Andere Argumente
o 3.1 Mangelndes Interesse
o 3.2 Mangelnde Sichtbarkeit
o 3.3 Sie existieren – wir haben sie nur verpasst
o 3.4 Sie existieren – wir werden ignoriert
o 3.5 Sie existieren – wir ignorieren sie
* 4 Folgerung
* 5 Weiterführende Literatur
* 6 Weblinks
* 7 Video
* 8 Einzelnachweise

Grundlegende Überlegung

Kern des Fermi-Paradoxons ist folgende Überlegung:

Wenn in der Milchstraße auch nur eine einzige Zivilisation existiert, die zu interstellarer Kolonisation fähig ist, dann könnte die gesamte Galaxis innerhalb weniger Millionen Jahre vollständig kolonisiert sein. Die Milchstraße ist nun weitaus älter als die notwendigen 20 bis 40 Millionen Jahre; folglich sollten außerirdische Zivilisationen überall in unserer galaktischen Nachbarschaft existieren. Bisher konnte jedoch kein Hinweis auf extraterrestrische Zivilisationen gefunden werden.

Das Paradoxon kann folgendermaßen zusammengefasst werden:

„Der weit verbreitete Glaube, es gäbe in unserem Universum viele technologisch fortschrittliche Zivilisationen, in Kombination mit unseren Beobachtungen, die das Gegenteil nahelegen, ist paradox und deutet darauf hin, dass entweder unser Verständnis oder unsere Beobachtungen fehlerhaft oder unvollständig sind.“

Mit dem Fermi-Paradoxon eng verbunden ist die Drake-Gleichung, mit deren Hilfe die Wahrscheinlichkeit für die gleichzeitige Existenz anderer Zivilisationen in der Galaxis abgeschätzt werden soll. Da bisher jedoch nahezu alle Parameter der Drake-Gleichung unbekannt sind, kann diese derzeit nicht zur Lösung des Paradoxons beitragen.

Zur Erklärung des Paradoxons gibt es mehrere Ansätze, dabei kann zwischen prinzipiellen Argumenten (die auf Grund der Naturgesetze für sämtliche Zivilisationen gleichermaßen gelten) und schwachen Argumenten unterschieden werden. Das Problem der schwachen Argumente besteht darin, dass Fermi davon ausgeht, dass nur eine einzige Zivilisation notwendig ist, um das beschriebene Paradoxon zu verursachen. Schwache Argumente stellen jedoch keine prinzipiellen Hindernisse dar. Wir müssten also davon ausgehen, dass sich sämtliche Zivilisationen ähnlich entwickeln und daher an denselben Hindernissen scheitern.

Folgende Passage wurde aus der Arbeit „The Fermi Paradox: An Approach Based on Percolation Theory“ von Geoffrey A. Landis dazu sinngemäß übersetzt:

„Vorgeschlagene Lösungen des Fermi-Paradoxons verneinen entweder vollständig die Möglichkeit extraterrestrischer Zivilisationen, eine Annahme, die bisher nicht belegt werden kann, oder akzeptieren die Möglichkeit außerirdischer technologischer Zivilisationen und schlagen Erklärungen vor, warum diese trotzdem nicht die Galaxis kolonisieren.
Die Erklärungen beinhalten dabei die Vorschläge, dass solche Zivilisationen zusammenbrechen oder sich selbst zerstören, ihnen die Ressourcen ausgehen, sie sich gegen Kolonisierung entscheiden oder zwar kolonisieren, aber uns bewusst ignorieren.
Das Problem mit diesen Erklärungsversuchen ist, dass sie alle eine Gleichartigkeit der Motive von Zivilisationen über extrem lange Zeiträume voraussetzen. Wenn auch nur eine einzige Zivilisation sich für die Kolonisierung der Galaxis entscheidet, müssen diese Erklärungsversuche scheitern.“

– [4]

Prinzipielle Argumente
Die Hypothese der ungewöhnlichen Erde / Wir sind tatsächlich alleine

Ein Gedankengang argumentiert, dass vielzelliges Leben im Universum außergewöhnlich selten ist, da erdähnliche Planeten potentiell selten sind. Das Argument dabei ist, dass viele unwahrscheinliche Zufälle zusammenkamen, die Leben auf der Erde möglich machten. Beispiele dafür sind die Position der Sonne in der Galaxis (Strahlung), die Position der Erde im Sonnensystem (Temperatur), die Existenz eines relativ großen Mondes (Stabilisierung der Erdachse) usw. (vgl. Hoimar v. Ditfurth, Kinder des Weltalls).

Letztlich werden bei diesem Erklärungsversuch die Parameter der Drake-Gleichung so gewählt, dass in unserer Galaxis nur eine einzige Zivilisation existiert, die unsere. Insofern verliert das Fermi-Paradoxon natürlich seinen paradoxen Charakter, da bereits eine der Grundannahmen abgelehnt wird.

Obwohl diese Hypothese vielfach als zwingend überzeugend angesehen wird, widersprechen andere der Seltenheit erdähnlicher Planeten (was sich durch viele Funde von Exo-Planeten nahelegt) oder behaupten, komplexes Leben benötige nicht zwingend erdähnliche Bedingungen, um sich zu entwickeln (siehe Kohlenstoffchauvinismus).

Eine Sonderform dieses Argumentes geht davon aus, dass die Entwicklung von höherer Intelligenz im Laufe der Evolution extrem unwahrscheinlich ist. Basis dafür ist die Tatsache, dass von keiner der komplexen Lebensformen, die in der Vergangenheit auf der Erde existierten, die Entstehung beziehungsweise das Vorhandensein von höherer Intelligenz bekannt ist.
Unmöglichkeit interstellarer Kolonisation / Kommunikation

Die Voraussetzung des Fermi-Paradoxons „… eine Zivilisation, die zu interstellarer Kolonisation fähig ist …“ kann möglicherweise prinzipiell nicht erfüllt werden. Unter diesen Umständen könnte es in der Milchstraße mehrere technische Zivilisationen geben, die jedoch räumlich zu weit voneinander entfernt sind, um sich gegenseitig zu beeinflussen.

Zur Veranschaulichung sei als Beispiel die Entfernung unserer Sonne zum nächsten Stern, Proxima Centauri, genannt, der selbst bei Lichtgeschwindigkeit erst nach 4,2 Jahren erreicht werden könnte; allerdings hat Proxima Centauri vermutlich keine Planeten. Da ein Überschreiten der Lichtgeschwindigkeit nach derzeitigem Kenntnisstand nicht möglich scheint, stellen sich einige Fragen:

* Ob eine Zivilisation (noch) die Ressourcen aufbringen könnte, um fremde Sternsysteme zu erreichen, sobald eine Situation eintritt, die eine solche Unternehmung lohnend oder gar notwendig erscheinen lässt.
* Welchen zeitlichen Versatz in der Kommunikation Populationen in verschiedenen Sonnensystemen akzeptieren können müssen, um überhaupt den für eine Zivilisation nötigen Zusammenhalt zu haben.

Verteilungsmuster / Zivilisatorische Diffusion

Nach einem Ansatz von Geoffrey A. Landis[5] kann die Kolonisation der Galaxis mittels der Perkolationstheorie untersucht werden als ein der Diffusion ähnlicher Vorgang. Landis geht dabei von zwei Prämissen aus:

1. Jede Zivilisation ist maximal in der Lage, direkte Nachbarsysteme in einem beschränkten Umkreis zu kolonisieren.
2. Jede Kolonie kann sich mit einer gewissen Wahrscheinlichkeit P zu einer ebenfalls kolonisierenden oder aber mit der Wahrscheinlichkeit 1 − P zu einer stagnierenden (bzw. nicht kolonisierenden) Zivilisation entwickeln.

Unter diesen Umständen würde die Galaxis nicht gleichmäßig bevölkert, vielmehr würden sich „Blasen“ herausbilden, die von stagnierenden Kolonien umgrenzt sind. Innerhalb dieser Blasen würde dann keine weitere Kolonisierung erfolgen. Umgekehrt könnte es dann auch Blasen mit einer hohen „Zivilisationsdichte“ geben. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Blasen wird dabei maßgeblich von der Wahrscheinlichkeit für erfolgreiche Kolonisierung sowie der Entwicklung zum kolonisierenden bzw. stagnierenden Zivilisationstyp beeinflusst.

* Liegt P nun unterhalb eines Grenzwertes P < Pc, wird die Kolonisierung nach einer endlichen Anzahl Kolonien stoppen.
* Liegt P oberhalb des Grenzwertes P > Pc, wird nahezu die gesamte Galaxis gefüllt, mit Ausnahme einiger kleiner Blasen.
* Liegt P nahe am Grenzwert P = Pc, wird die Galaxis von einer fraktalen Struktur durchzogen, in der sowohl große bevölkerte als auch nicht bevölkerte Gebiete existieren. Wir würden dann in einem nicht bevölkerten Gebiet leben.

Andere Argumente
Mangelndes Interesse

Selbst wenn die technische Möglichkeit zu interstellarer Kommunikation und/oder Kolonisation gegeben ist, stellt sich die Frage, ob eine Zivilisation überhaupt ein ökonomisches oder philosophisches Interesse an der Nutzung dieser Technologie hat. Unsere Zivilisation hat bisher keine großen Anstrengungen unternommen, bewusst Signale auszusenden, und die menschliche Raumfahrt beschränkt sich weitgehend auf das Aussenden von Sonden. Selbst prinzipiell mögliche interplanetare Raumflüge werden hinsichtlich ihres ökonomischen und wissenschaftlichen Sinns hinterfragt.

Siehe auch: technologische Singularität
Mangelnde Sichtbarkeit

Das Aussenden von Radiosignalen zur Kommunikation ist relativ ineffizient. Falls alle Zivilisationen innerhalb kurzer Zeit zu effizienteren Kommunikationsmethoden übergehen (selbstfokussierende Teilchenstrahlen o. Ä.), sinkt der Anteil an Radiostrahlung, über den sich eine Zivilisation bemerkbar machen würde.

Auch wurde vorgeschlagen, ein fundamentales Axiom der Informationstheorie könne hinter dem Fehlen erkennbarer Signale stecken. Die Informationstheorie besagt, dass eine maximal komprimierte Nachricht für jene ununterscheidbar vom Hintergrundrauschen ist, die den Kompressionsalgorithmus nicht kennen. SETI hingegen sucht ausschließlich nach dem simpelsten aller Signale, einer unmodulierten Sinuskurve. Die Grundannahme von SETI ist die Bereitschaft anderer Lebensformen, sich durch ein einfach zu entdeckendes Signal deutlich mitzuteilen. Aus diesen Gründen würden die heutigen Suchmethoden eine hochgradig komprimierte Übertragung schlicht übersehen.

Siehe auch: Dyson-Sphäre
Sie existieren – wir haben sie nur verpasst

Diese Hypothese basiert darauf, dass alle besuchenden Zivilisationen langfristig stagnieren oder aussterben, statt zu expandieren. Das kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden, denn die gesamte Dauer der menschlichen Existenz ist auf kosmologischer Skala derartig klein, dass selbst ein Weiterleben unserer Spezies über Hunderttausende von Jahren wenig ändert. Dadurch könnten Zivilisationen zeitlich und räumlich schlicht zu weit auseinanderliegen, um sich zu begegnen. Dieser Hypothese widerspricht die Möglichkeit der Von-Neumann-Sonden, die eine weit längere Lebensdauer als ihre Usprungszivilisation haben könnten. Eine Zivilisation, die Von-Neumann-Sonden aussendet, könnte diese auch in ihrer Reproduktion beschränken, so dass sich jedem Sonnensystem maximal eine Sonde zuordnen würde. Diese Sonde würde sich nur reproduzieren, wenn ihre eigene Lebensdauer abläuft. Sie könnten als Bojen auch stationär sein und z.B. nur ein schwaches Signal aussenden.
Sie existieren – wir werden ignoriert

Bei dieser Annahme wird vorausgesetzt, dass unter allen Zivilisationen in unserer Nachbarschaft ein Konsens darüber herrscht, eine Kontaktaufnahme zu vermeiden. Diese Spekulation wird teilweise auch als „Galaktischer Zoo“ bezeichnet.
Sie existieren – wir ignorieren sie

Dabei wird davon ausgegangen, dass außerirdische Zivilisationen bereits Kontaktversuche sowohl in der Vergangenheit als auch der Gegenwart unternommen haben, diese von der modernen Wissenschaft jedoch ignoriert oder von einer oder mehreren Regierungen geheim gehalten würden. Sie ist in etlichen Science-Fiction Romanen und Filmen verarbeitet, so unter anderem in Per Anhalter durch die Galaxis und wird ebenso bei einigen Deutungen von UFO-Sichtungen, Verschwörungstheorien und Anhängern verschiedener Pseudowissenschaften vertreten.
Folgerung

Die bisherige Datenbasis lässt es nicht zu, zu einer Abschätzung auf Basis der Drake-Gleichung hinsichtlich der Häufigkeit außerirdischer Zivilisationen zu kommen. Erst in den nächsten Jahren oder Jahrzehnten werden möglicherweise erdähnliche Planeten in anderen Planetensystemen gefunden, bis dahin müssen sämtliche Lösungsansätze spekulativ bleiben.
Weiterführende Literatur

* If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens… Where Is Everybody? von Stephen Webb (Copernicus Books; 2002) ISBN 0-387-95501-1
* The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in 8 Easy Steps von Marshall T. Savage (Empyrean Publishing; Denver; 1992) Seiten 341–354 ISBN 0-9633914-8-8
* „Where Are They? Maybe we are alone in the galaxy after all“ von Ian Crawford (Scientific American, Juni 2000):

Weblinks

* Space.com: Our Galaxy Should Be Teeming With Civilizations, But Where Are They? von Seth Shostak
* The Possibilities of FTL: Or Fermi’s Paradox Reconsidered von F.E. Freiheit IV
* Fermi’s Paradox (i.e. Where are They?) von James Schombert
* Answering the Fermi Paradox: Exploring the Mechanisms of Universal Transcension von John Smart
* The Great Filter – Are We Almost Past It? von Robin Hanson
* Extraterrestrial Intelligence in the Solar System: Resolving the Fermi Paradox, das nahelegt, unsere Beobachtungen seien unvollständig und
* There Is No Fermi Paradox, das einen logischen Fehler im Fermi-Paradoxon wähnt, beide von Robert Freitas
* Beyond Kardaschev: Possible Answer to Fermi’s Paradox von Paul Hughes
* ausführlicher Artikel mit weiterführenden Informationen
* www.wissenschaft.de: Warum uns die Außerirdischen noch nicht gefunden haben – Aliens würden Ewigkeiten brauchen, um die Galaxis nach intelligentem Leben zu durchforsten (eine mögliche Erklärung für das Fermi-Paradoxon)

Video

* Was ist der galaktische Zoo? aus der Fernseh-Sendereihe alpha-Centauri

Einzelnachweise

1. ↑ Sagan, Carl. Cosmos, Ballantine Books 1985
2. ↑ Michael H. Hart, "An Explanation for the Absence of Extraterrestrials on Earth," The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 16 (1975): 128.
3. ↑ Paul Wesson, Juni 1992, Cosmology, extraterrestrial intelligence, and a resolution of the Fermi-Hart paradox, Royal Astronomical Society, Quarterly Journal, Bd. 31, S.161–170, issn 0035-8738, [1], Abgerufen am 29. September 2009
4. ↑ The Fermi Paradox: An Approach Based on Percolation Theory von Geoffrey A. Landis (Dritter Absatz der Introduction)
5. ↑ The Fermi Paradox: An Approach Based on Percolation Theory von Geoffrey A. Landis

Von „http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi-Paradoxon“
Kategorien: Paradoxon | Astrobiologie
Meine Werkzeuge

* Anmelden / Benutzerkonto erstellen

Namensräume

* Artikel
* Diskussion

Varianten

Ansichten

* Lesen
* Ungesichtete Änderungen
* Bearbeiten
* Versionsgeschichte

Aktionen

Suche
Volltext
Navigation

* Hauptseite
* Über Wikipedia
* Themenportale
* Von A bis Z
* Zufälliger Artikel

Mitmachen

* Hilfe
* Autorenportal
* Letzte Änderungen
* Kontakt
* Spenden

Drucken/exportieren

* Buch erstellen
* Als PDF herunterladen

Werkzeuge

* Links auf diese Seite
* Änderungen an verlinkten Seiten
* Spezialseiten
* Permanenter Link
* Seite zitieren

In anderen Sprachen

* Български
* বাংলা
* Català
* Česky
* Dansk
* English
* Esperanto
* Español
* Suomi
* Français
* Galego
* עברית
* Hrvatski
* Magyar
* Italiano
* 日本語
* 한국어
* Lietuvių
* Latviešu
* Nederlands
* Polski
* Português
* Română
* Русский
* Slovenčina
* Српски / Srpski
* Svenska
* Türkçe
* Українська
* Tiếng Việt
* 中文

* Der Text ist unter der Lizenz „Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike“ verfügbar; zusätzliche Bedingungen können anwendbar sein. Einzelheiten sind in den Nutzungsbedingungen beschrieben.
Wikipedia® ist eine eingetragene Marke der Wikimedia Foundation Inc.

* Datenschutz
* Über Wikipedia
* Impressum




==============================================
en: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fermi_paradox&oldid=401229311



Fermi paradox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by 128.36.226.171 (talk) at 10:43, 8 December 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 10:43, 8 December 2010 by 128.36.226.171 (talk)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the absence of evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence. For the type of estimation problem, see Fermi problem. For the music album, see Fermi Paradox (album).
A graphical representation of the Arecibo message — Humanity's first attempt to use radio waves to actively communicate its existence to alien civilizations

The Fermi paradox is the apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of evidence for, or contact with, such civilizations.

The age of the universe and its vast number of stars suggest that if the Earth is typical, extraterrestrial life should be common.[1] In an informal discussion in 1950, the physicist Enrico Fermi questioned why, if a multitude of advanced extraterrestrial civilizations exist in the Milky Way galaxy, evidence such as spacecraft or probes is not seen. A more detailed examination of the implications of the topic began with a paper by Michael H. Hart in 1975, and it is sometimes referred to as the Fermi-Hart paradox.[2] Other common names for the same phenomenon are Fermi's question ("Where are they?"), the Fermi Problem, the Great Silence,[3][4][5][6][7] and silentium universi[7][8] (Latin for "the silence of the universe"; the misspelling silencium universi is also common).

There have been attempts to resolve the Fermi paradox by locating evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations, along with proposals that such life could exist without human knowledge. Counterarguments suggest that intelligent extraterrestrial life does not exist or occurs so rarely or briefly that humans will never make contact with it.

Starting with Hart, a great deal of effort has gone into developing scientific theories about, and possible models of, extraterrestrial life, and the Fermi paradox has become a theoretical reference point in much of this work. The problem has spawned numerous scholarly works addressing it directly, while questions that relate to it have been addressed in fields as diverse as astronomy, biology, ecology, and philosophy. The emerging field of astrobiology has brought an interdisciplinary approach to the Fermi paradox and the question of extraterrestrial life.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Basis
* 2 Name
* 3 Drake equation
* 4 Empirical resolution attempts
o 4.1 Mainstream astronomy and SETI
o 4.2 Radio emissions
o 4.3 Direct planetary observation
o 4.4 Alien constructs
+ 4.4.1 Probes, colonies, and other artifacts
+ 4.4.2 Advanced stellar-scale artifacts
* 5 Explaining the paradox theoretically
o 5.1 Few, if any, other civilizations currently exist
+ 5.1.1 No other civilizations have arisen
+ 5.1.2 It is the nature of intelligent life to destroy itself
+ 5.1.3 It is the nature of intelligent life to destroy others
+ 5.1.4 Life is periodically destroyed by naturally occurring events
+ 5.1.5 Human beings were created alone
o 5.2 They do exist, but we see no evidence
+ 5.2.1 Communication is impossible due to problems of scale
# 5.2.1.1 Intelligent civilizations are too far apart in space or time
# 5.2.1.2 It is too expensive to spread physically throughout the galaxy
# 5.2.1.3 Human beings have not been searching long enough
+ 5.2.2 Communication is impossible for technical reasons
# 5.2.2.1 Humans are not listening properly
# 5.2.2.2 Civilizations only broadcast detectable radio signals for a brief period of time
# 5.2.2.3 They tend to experience a technological singularity
# 5.2.2.4 The evidence is being suppressed
+ 5.2.3 They choose not to interact with us
# 5.2.3.1 It is the nature of intelligent life to keep silent
# 5.2.3.2 Earth is purposely isolated (The zoo hypothesis)
# 5.2.3.3 It is dangerous to communicate
# 5.2.3.4 They are too alien
# 5.2.3.5 They are non-technological
+ 5.2.4 They are here unobserved
* 6 See also
* 7 Notes
* 8 References
* 9 Bibliography
* 10 Further reading
* 11 External links

[edit] Basis

The Fermi paradox is a conflict between an argument of scale and probability and a lack of evidence. A more complete definition could be stated thus:

The apparent size and age of the universe suggest that many technologically advanced extraterrestrial civilizations ought to exist.
However, this hypothesis seems inconsistent with the lack of observational evidence to support it.

The first aspect of the paradox, "the argument by scale," is a function of the raw numbers involved: there are an estimated 100 billion[9] (2-4 × 1011) stars in the Milky Way and 70 sextillion (7 × 1022) in the visible universe.[10] Even if intelligent life occurs on only a minuscule percentage of planets around these stars, there might still be a great number of civilizations extant in the Milky Way galaxy alone. This argument also assumes the mediocrity principle, which states that Earth is not special, but merely a typical planet, subject to the same laws, effects, and likely outcomes as any other world.

The second cornerstone of the Fermi paradox is a rejoinder to the argument by scale: given intelligent life's ability to overcome scarcity, and its tendency to colonize new habitats, it seems likely that any advanced civilization would seek out new resources and colonize first their own star system, and then the surrounding star systems. Since there is no conclusive or certifiable evidence on Earth or elsewhere in the known universe of other intelligent life after 13.7 billion years of the universe's history, it may be assumed that intelligent life is rare or that our assumptions about the general behavior of intelligent species are flawed.

The Fermi paradox can be asked in two ways. The first is, "Why are no aliens or their artifacts physically here?" If interstellar travel is possible, even the "slow" kind nearly within the reach of Earth technology, then it would only take from 5 million to 50 million years to colonize the galaxy.[11] This is a relatively small amount of time on a geological scale, let alone a cosmological one. Since there are many stars older than the Sun, or since intelligent life might have evolved earlier elsewhere, the question then becomes why the galaxy has not been colonized already. Even if colonization is impractical or undesirable to all alien civilizations, large-scale exploration of the galaxy is still possible; the means of exploration and theoretical probes involved are discussed extensively below. However, no signs of either colonization or exploration have been generally acknowledged.

The argument above may not hold for the universe as a whole, since travel times may well explain the lack of physical presence on Earth of alien inhabitants of far away galaxies. However, the question then becomes "Why do we see no signs of intelligent life?" since a sufficiently advanced civilization[Note 1] could potentially be observable over a significant fraction of the size of the observable universe.[12] Even if such civilizations are rare, the scale argument indicates they should exist somewhere at some point during the history of the universe, and since they could be detected from far away over a considerable period of time, many more potential sites for their origin are within range of our observation. However, no incontrovertible signs of such civilizations have been detected.

It is unclear which version of the paradox is stronger.[Note 2]
[edit] Name

In 1950, while working at Los Alamos National Laboratory, the physicist Enrico Fermi had a casual conversation while walking to lunch with colleagues Emil Konopinski, Edward Teller and Herbert York. The men discussed a recent spate of UFO reports and an Alan Dunn cartoon[13] facetiously blaming the disappearance of municipal trashcans on marauding aliens. They then had a more serious discussion regarding the chances of humans observing faster-than-light travel by some material object within the next ten years, which Teller put at one in a million, but Fermi put closer to one in ten. The conversation shifted to other subjects, until during lunch Fermi suddenly exclaimed, "Where are they?" (alternatively, "Where is everybody?")[14] One participant recollects that Fermi then made a series of rapid calculations using estimated figures (Fermi was known for his ability to make good estimates from first principles and minimal data, see Fermi problem.) According to this account, he then concluded that Earth should have been visited long ago and many times over.[14][15]
[edit] Drake equation
Main article: Drake equation

While numerous theories and principles are related to the Fermi paradox, the most closely related is the Drake equation.

The equation was formulated by Dr. Frank Drake in 1961, a decade after the objections raised by Enrico Fermi, in an attempt to find a systematic means to evaluate the numerous probabilities involved in alien life. The speculative equation factors in: the rate of star formation in the galaxy; the fraction of stars with planets and the number per star that are habitable; the fraction of those planets which develop life, the fraction of intelligent life, and the further fraction of detectable technological intelligent life; and finally the length of time such civilizations are detectable. The fundamental problem is that the last four terms (fraction of planets with life, odds life becomes intelligent, odds intelligent life becomes detectable, and detectable lifetime of civilizations) are completely unknown. We have only one example, rendering statistical estimates impossible, and even the example we have is subject to a strong anthropic bias.

A deeper objection is that the very form of the Drake equation assumes that civilizations arise and then die out within their original solar systems. If interstellar colonization is possible, then this assumption is invalid, and the equations of population dynamics would apply instead.[16]

The Drake equation has been used by both optimists and pessimists with wildly differing results. Dr. Carl Sagan, using optimistic numbers, suggested as many as one million communicating civilizations in the Milky Way in 1966, though he later suggested that the number could be far smaller. Skeptics, such as Frank Tipler, have used pessimistic numbers and concluded that the average number of civilizations in a galaxy is much less than one.[17][Note 3] Frank Drake himself has commented that the Drake equation is unlikely to settle the Fermi paradox; instead it is just a way of "organizing our ignorance" on the subject.[18]
[edit] Empirical resolution attempts

One obvious way to resolve the Fermi paradox would be to find conclusive evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence. Efforts to find such evidence have been made since 1960, and several are ongoing as of 2010.[19] As human beings do not possess interstellar travel capability, such searches are being remotely carried out at great distances and rely on analysis of very subtle evidence. This limits possible discoveries to civilizations which alter their environment in a detectable way, or produce effects that are observable at a distance, such as radio emissions. It is very unlikely that non-technological civilizations will be detectable from Earth in the near future.

One difficulty in searching is avoiding an overly anthropocentric viewpoint. Conjecture on the type of evidence likely to be found often focuses on the types of activities that humans have performed, or likely would perform given more advanced technology. Intelligent aliens might avoid these "expected" activities, or perform activities totally novel to humans.
[edit] Mainstream astronomy and SETI

There are two ways that astronomy might find evidence of an extraterrestrial civilization. One is that conventional astronomers, studying stars, planets, and galaxies, might serendipitously observe some phenomenon that cannot be explained without positing an intelligent civilization as the source. This has been suspected several times of pulsars, when first discovered, were called LGMs (Little Green Men), because of the precise repetition of their pulses (they rival the best atomic clocks). Likewise Seyfert galaxies have been suspected to be industrial accidents[20] because their enormous and directed energy output had no initial explanation. Eventually, natural explanations not involving intelligent life have been found for all such observations to date. Specifically, pulsars are now attributed to neutron stars, and Seyfert galaxies to an end-on view of the accretion onto the black holes but the possibility of discovery remains.[21]

The other way astronomy might settle the Fermi paradox is through a search specifically dedicated to finding evidence of life.
[edit] Radio emissions
Further information: SETI, Project Ozma, Project Cyclops, Project Phoenix (SETI), SERENDIP, and Allen Telescope Array
Radio telescopes are often used by SETI projects

Radio technology and the ability to construct a radio telescope are presumed to be a natural advance for technological species,[22] theoretically creating effects that might be detected over interstellar distances. Sensitive observers of the solar system, for example, would note unusually intense radio waves for a G2 star due to Earth's television and telecommunication broadcasts. In the absence of an apparent natural cause, alien observers might infer the existence of terrestrial civilization.

Therefore, the careful searching of radio emissions from space for non-natural signals may lead to the detection of alien civilizations. Such signals could be either "accidental" by-products of a civilization, or deliberate attempts to communicate, such as the Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence's Arecibo message. A number of astronomers and observatories have attempted and are attempting to detect such evidence, mostly through the SETI organization, although other approaches, such as optical SETI, also exist.

Several decades of SETI analysis have not revealed any main sequence stars with unusually bright or meaningfully repetitive radio emissions, although there have been several candidate signals. On August 15, 1977 the "Wow! signal" was picked up by The Big Ear radio telescope. However, the Big Ear only looks at each point on the sky for 72 seconds, and re-examinations of the same spot have found nothing. In 2003, Radio source SHGb02+14a was isolated by SETI@home analysis, although it has largely been discounted by further study. There are numerous technical assumptions underlying SETI that may cause human beings to miss radio emissions with present search techniques; these are discussed below.
[edit] Direct planetary observation
A composite picture of Earth at night, created with data from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) Operational Linescan System (OLS). Human civilization is detectable from space.

Detection and classification of exoplanets has come out of recent refinements in mainstream astronomical instruments and analysis. While this is a new field in astronomy — the first published paper claiming to have discovered an exoplanet was released in 1989 — it is possible that planets which are likely able to support life will be found in the near future.

Direct evidence for the existence of life may eventually be observable, such as the detection of biotic signature gases (such as methane and oxygen) — or even the industrial air pollution of a technologically advanced civilization — in an exoplanet's atmosphere by means of spectrographic analysis.[23] With improvements in our observational capabilities, it may eventually even be possible to detect direct evidence such as that which humanity produces (see right).

However, exoplanets are rarely directly observed (the first claim to have done so was made in 2004[24]); rather, their existence is usually inferred from the effects they have on the star(s) they orbit. This means that usually only the mass and orbit of an exoplanet can be deduced. This information, along with the stellar classification of its sun, and educated guesses as to its composition (usually based on the mass of the planet, and its distance from its sun), allows only for rough approximations of the planetary environment.

Prior to 2009, methods for exoplanet detection were not likely to detect life-bearing Earth-like worlds. Methods such as gravitational microlensing can detect the presence of "small" worlds, potentially even smaller than the Earth, but can only detect such worlds for very brief moments of time, and no follow-up is possible. Other methods such as radial velocity, astrometry, and the transit method allow prolonged observations of exoplanet effects, but only work with worlds that are many times the mass of Earth, at least when performed while looking through the atmosphere. These seem unlikely candidates to harbor Earth-like life. However, exoplanet detection and classification is a very active sub-discipline in astronomy, with 424 such planets being detected between 1988 and 2010,[25] and the first possibly terrestrial planet discovered within a star's habitable zone being found in 2007.[26] New refinements in exoplanet detection methods, and use of existing methods from space, (such as the Kepler Mission, launched in 2009) are expected to detect and characterize terrestrial-size planets, and determine if they are within the habitable zones of their stars. Such observational refinements may allow us to better gauge how common potentially habitable worlds are. Using methods like the Drake equation with this data would therefore allow a much better idea of how common life in the universe might be; this would have a profound influence over the expectations behind the Fermi paradox itself.
[edit] Alien constructs
[edit] Probes, colonies, and other artifacts
Further information: Von Neumann probe and Bracewell probe

As noted, given the size and age of the universe, and the relative rapidity at which dispersion of intelligent life can occur, evidence of alien colonization attempts might plausibly be discovered. Evidence of exploration not containing extraterrestrial life, such as probes and information gathering devices, may also await discovery.

Some theoretical exploration techniques such as the Von Neumann probe (a self-replicating device) could exhaustively explore a galaxy the size of the Milky Way in as little as half a million years, with comparatively little investment in materials and energy relative to the results. If even a single civilization in the Milky Way attempted this, such probes could spread throughout the entire galaxy. Evidence of such probes might be found in the solar system — perhaps in the asteroid belt where raw materials would be plentiful and easily accessed.[27]

Another possibility for contact with an alien probe — one that would be trying to find human beings — is an alien Bracewell probe. Such a device would be an autonomous space probe whose purpose is to seek out and communicate with alien civilizations (as opposed to Von Neumann probes, which are usually described as purely exploratory). These were proposed as an alternative to carrying a slow speed-of-light dialogue between vastly distant neighbours. Rather than contending with the long delays a radio dialogue would suffer, a probe housing an artificial intelligence would seek out an alien civilization to carry on a close range communication with the discovered civilization. The findings of such a probe would still have to be transmitted to the home civilization at light speed, but an information-gathering dialogue could be conducted in real time.[28]

Since the 1950s, direct exploration has been carried out on a small fraction of the solar system and no evidence that it has ever been visited by alien colonists, or probes, has been uncovered. Detailed exploration of areas of the solar system where resources would be plentiful — such as the asteroids, the Kuiper belt, the Oort cloud and the planetary ring systems — may theoretically yet produce evidence of alien exploration, though these regions are vast and difficult to investigate. There have been preliminary efforts in this direction in the form of the SETA and SETV projects to search for extraterrestrial artifacts or other evidence of extraterrestrial visitation within the solar system.[29] There have also been attempts to signal, attract, or activate Bracewell probes in Earth's local vicinity, including by scientists Robert Freitas and Francisco Valdes.[30] Many of the projects that fall under this umbrella are considered "fringe" science by astronomers and none of the projects has located any artifacts.

Should alien artifacts be discovered, even here on Earth, they may not be recognizable as such. The products of an alien mind and an advanced alien technology might not be perceptible or recognizable as artificial constructs. Exploratory devices in the form of bio-engineered life forms created through synthetic biology would presumably disintegrate after a point, leaving no evidence; an alien information gathering system based on molecular nanotechnology could be all around us at this very moment, completely undetected. The same might be true of civilizations that actively hide their investigations from us, for possible reasons described further in this article. Also, Clarke's third law suggests that an alien civilization well in advance of humanity's might have means of investigation that are not yet conceivable to human beings.
[edit] Advanced stellar-scale artifacts
Further information: Dyson sphere, Kardashev scale, Alderson disk, Matrioshka brain, Stellar engine
A variant of the speculative Dyson sphere. Such large scale artifacts would drastically alter the spectrum of a star.

In 1959, Freeman Dyson observed that every developing human civilization constantly increases its energy consumption, and theoretically, a civilization of sufficient age would require all the energy produced by its star. The Dyson Sphere was the thought experiment that he derived as a solution: a shell or cloud of objects enclosing a star to harness as much radiant energy as possible. Such a feat of astroengineering would drastically alter the observed spectrum of the star involved, changing it at least partly from the normal emission lines of a natural stellar atmosphere, to that of a black body radiation, probably with a peak in the infrared. Dyson himself speculated that advanced alien civilizations might be detected by examining the spectra of stars, searching for such an altered spectrum.[31]

Since then, several other theoretical stellar-scale megastructures have been proposed, but the central idea remains that a highly advanced civilization — Type II or greater on the Kardashev scale — could alter its environment enough as to be detectable from interstellar distances.

However, such constructs may be more difficult to detect than originally thought. Dyson spheres might have different emission spectra depending on the desired internal environment; life based on high-temperature reactions may require a high temperature environment, with resulting "waste radiation" in the visible spectrum, not the infrared.[32] Additionally, a variant of the Dyson sphere has been proposed which would be difficult to observe from any great distance; a Matrioshka brain is a series of concentric spheres, each radiating less energy per area than its inner neighbour. The outermost sphere of such a structure could be close to the temperature of the interstellar background radiation, and thus be all but invisible.

There have been some preliminary attempts to find evidence of the existence of Dyson spheres or other large Type-II or Type-III Kardashev scale artifacts that would alter the spectra of their core stars.[33][34] These surveys have not located anything yet, though they are still incomplete. Similarly, direct observation of thousands of galaxies has shown no explicit evidence of artificial construction or modifications.
[edit] Explaining the paradox theoretically

Certain theoreticians accept that the apparent absence of evidence proves the absence of extraterrestrials and attempt to explain why. Others offer possible frameworks in which the silence may be explained without ruling out the possibility of such life, including assumptions about extraterrestrial behaviour and technology. Each of these hypothesized explanations is essentially an argument for decreasing the value of one or more of the terms in the Drake equation. The arguments are not, in general, mutually exclusive. For example, it could be that both life is rare, and technical civilizations are short lived, or many other combinations of the explanations below.[35]
[edit] Few, if any, other civilizations currently exist

One explanation is that the human civilization is alone (or very nearly so) in the galaxy. Several theories along these lines have been proposed, explaining why intelligent life might be either very rare, or very short lived. Implications of these hypotheses are examined as the Great Filter.[5]
[edit] No other civilizations have arisen
See also: Rare Earth hypothesis

Those who believe that extraterrestrial intelligent life does not exist argue that the conditions needed for life — or at least complex life — to evolve are rare or even unique to Earth. This is known as the Rare Earth hypothesis, which attempts to resolve the Fermi paradox by rejecting the mediocrity principle, and asserting that Earth is not typical, but unusual or even unique. While a unique Earth has historically been assumed on philosophical or religious grounds, the Rare Earth Hypothesis uses quantifiable and statistical arguments to argue that multicellular life is exceedingly rare in the universe because Earth-like planets are themselves exceedingly rare and/or many improbable coincidences have converged to make complex life on Earth possible.[36] It is possible that complex life may evolve through other mechanisms than those found specifically here on Earth,[36] but the fact that in the extremely long history of life on the Earth only one species has developed a civilization to the point of being capable of space flight and radio technology; or, more basically, abstract ideas such as music, art, or religion lends more credence to the idea of technologically advanced civilizations being rare in the universe.

For example, the emergence of intelligence may have been an evolutionary accident. Geoffrey Miller proposes that human intelligence is the result of runaway sexual selection, which takes unpredictable directions. Steven Pinker, in his book How the Mind Works, cautions that the idea that evolution of life (once it has reached a certain minimum complexity) is bound to produce intelligent beings, relies on the fallacy of the "ladder of evolution": As evolution does not strive for a goal but just happens, it uses the adaptation most useful for a given ecological niche, and the fact that, on Earth, this led to language-capable sentience only once so far may suggest that this adaptation is only rarely a good choice and hence by no means a sure endpoint of the evolution of a tree of life.

Another theory along these lines is that even if the conditions needed for life might be common in the universe, that the formation of life itself, a complex array of molecules that are capable simultaneously of reproduction, of extraction of base components from the environment, and of obtaining energy in a form that life can use to maintain the reaction (or the initial abiogenesis on a potential life-bearing planet), might ultimately be very rare.

Additionally, in the nondirectional meandering from initial life to humans, other low-probability happenings may have been the transition from prokaryotic cells to eukaryotic cells (with separate nucleus, organelles, specialization, and a cytoskeleton allowing the cell to take on different shapes) and the transition from single-cellular life to multicellular life, which was recorded in the Cambrian Explosion of 530 mya when significant numbers of organisms had evolved hard body parts, although multicellular life perhaps first started to evolve a couple of hundred million years before that. Remember, for most of Earth's history, there have only been single-celled creatures.

And there are many other potential branching points. For example, perhaps the transition from ocean creatures to land-dwelling creatures crucially depends on an unusually large moon and significant tides.

It is also possible that intelligence is common, but industrial civilization is not. For example, the rise of industrialism on Earth was driven by the presence of convenient energy sources such as fossil fuels. If such energy sources are rare or nonexistent elsewhere, then it may be far more difficult for an intelligent race to advance technologically to the point where we could communicate with them. There may also be other unique factors on which our civilization is dependent. Or, on a water world, where the intelligent creatures are something like dolphins, it may be difficult to build fire and forge metals.

Insofar as the Rare Earth Hypothesis privileges life on Earth and its process of formation, it is a variant of the anthropic principle. The variant of the anthropic principle states the universe seems uniquely suited towards developing human intelligence. This philosophical stance opposes not only the mediocrity principle, but also the wider Copernican principle, which suggests there is no privileged location in the universe.

Opponents dismiss both Rare Earth and the anthropic principle as tautological — if a condition must exist in the universe for human life to arise, then the universe must already meet that condition, as human life exists — and as an unimaginative argument. According to this analysis, the Rare Earth hypothesis confuses a description of how life on Earth arose with a uniform conclusion of how life must arise.[37] While the probability of the specific conditions on Earth being widely replicated is low, we do not know what complex life may require in order to evolve.[38][39]
[edit] It is the nature of intelligent life to destroy itself
See also: Doomsday argument

This is the argument that technological civilizations may usually or invariably destroy themselves before or shortly after developing radio or space flight technology. Possible means of annihilation include nuclear war, biological warfare or accidental contamination, nanotechnological catastrophe, ill-advised physics experiments,[Note 4] a badly programmed super-intelligence, or a Malthusian catastrophe after the deterioration of a planet's ecosphere. This general theme is explored both in fiction and in mainstream scientific theorizing.[40] Indeed, there are probabilistic arguments which suggest that human extinction may occur sooner rather than later. In 1966 Sagan and Shklovskii suggested that technological civilizations will either tend to destroy themselves within a century of developing interstellar communicative capability or master their self-destructive tendencies and survive for billion-year timescales.[41] Self-annihilation may also be viewed in terms of thermodynamics: insofar as life is an ordered system that can sustain itself against the tendency to disorder, the "external transmission" or interstellar communicative phase may be the point at which the system becomes unstable and self-destructs.[42]

From a Darwinian perspective, self-destruction would be a paradoxical outcome of evolutionary success. The evolutionary psychology that developed during the competition for scarce resources over the course of human evolution has left the species subject to aggressive, instinctual drives. These compel humanity to consume resources, extend longevity, and to reproduce — in part, the very motives that led to the development of technological society. It seems likely that intelligent extraterrestrial life would evolve in a similar fashion and thus face the same possibility of self-destruction. And yet, to provide a good answer to Fermi's Question, self-destruction by technological species would have to be a near universal occurrence.

This argument does not require the civilization to entirely self-destruct, only to become once again non-technological. In other ways it could persist and even thrive according to evolutionary standards, which postulate producing offspring as the sole goal of life — not "progress", be it in terms of technology or even intelligence.
[edit] It is the nature of intelligent life to destroy others
See also: technological singularity and Von Neumann probe

Another possibility is that an intelligent species beyond a certain point of technological capability will destroy other intelligence as it appears, as is exemplified by the theorised extermination of Neanderthals by early man. The idea that someone, or something, is destroying intelligent life in the universe has been well explored in science fiction[Note 5] and scientific literature.[3] A species might undertake such extermination out of expansionist motives, paranoia, or simple aggression. In 1981, cosmologist Edward Harrison argued that such behavior would be an act of prudence: an intelligent species that has overcome its own self-destructive tendencies might view any other species bent on galactic expansion as a kind of virus.[43] It has also been suggested that a successful alien species would be a superpredator, as is Homo sapiens.[44]

This hypothesis requires at least one civilization to have arisen in the past, and the first civilization would not have faced this problem.[45] However, it could still be that Earth is alone now. Like exploration, the extermination of other civilizations might be carried out with self-replicating spacecraft. Under such a scenario,[Note 5] even if a civilization that created such machines were to disappear, the probes could outlive their creators, destroying civilizations far into the future.

If true, this argument reduces the number of visible civilizations in two ways — by destroying some civilizations, and forcing others to remain quiet, under fear of discovery (see They choose not to interact with us) so we would see no signs of them.
[edit] Life is periodically destroyed by naturally occurring events

On Earth, there have been numerous major extinction events that destroyed the majority of complex species alive at the time. The extinction of the dinosaurs is the best known example. These are believed to be caused by events such as impact from a large meteorite, massive volcano eruptions, or astronomical events such as gamma ray bursts.[46] It may be the case that such extinction events are common throughout the universe and periodically destroy intelligent life (or at least destroy their civilizations) before the species is able to develop the technology to communicate with other species.[47]
[edit] Human beings were created alone

Religious and philosophical speculation about extraterrestrial intelligent life long predates the modern scientific inquiry into the subject. Some of earliest evidence of people suggesting that there may be other inhabited worlds exist were the Greek philosopher Epicurus (4th century BC). Some religious thinkers, including the Jewish rationalist commentator Rabbi Hasdai Crescas (c. 1340–1410/1411) and the Christian philosopher Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464), also put forward their views of the possibility of such extraterrestrial intelligence. On the other hand, at least some strains within the Western religious traditions suggest the uniqueness of human beings in the divine plan and would counsel against belief in intelligent life on other worlds.[48]

Religious reasons for doubting the existence of extraterrestrial intelligent life resemble some forms of the Rare Earth Hypothesis. The argument here would be a teleological form of the strong anthropic principle: the universe was designed for the express purpose of creating human (and only human) intelligence.[49] This argument presupposes that a prior advanced intelligence existed in order to create human life, which might pose the question whether that intelligence was the only one to exist before it created us. This would leave a form of the Fermi Paradox still unanswered.
[edit] They do exist, but we see no evidence

It may be that technological extraterrestrial civilizations exist, but that human beings cannot communicate with them because of constraints: problems of scale or of technology; because they do not wish to communicate or their nature is simply too alien for meaningful communication, or perhaps even be recognized as technology.
[edit] Communication is impossible due to problems of scale
See also: Relativity of simultaneity
[edit] Intelligent civilizations are too far apart in space or time
NASA's conception of the Terrestrial Planet Finder

It may be that non-colonizing technologically capable alien civilizations exist, but that they are simply too far apart for meaningful two-way communication.[50] If two civilizations are separated by several thousand light years, it is very possible that one or both cultures may become extinct before meaningful dialogue can be established. Human searches may be able to detect their existence, but communication will remain impossible because of distance. This problem might be ameliorated somewhat if contact/communication is made through a Bracewell probe. In this case at least one partner in the exchange may obtain meaningful information. Alternatively, a civilization may simply broadcast its knowledge, and leave it to the receiver to make what they may of it. This is similar to the transmission of information from ancient civilizations to the present,[51] and humanity has undertaken similar activities like the Arecibo message, which could transfer information about Earth's intelligent species, even if it never yields a response (or does not yield a response in time for humanity to receive it). It is also possible that archaeological evidence of past civilizations may be detected through deep space observations — especially if they left behind large artifacts such as Dyson spheres.

The problem of distance is compounded by the fact that timescales affording a "window of opportunity" for detection or contact might be quite small. Advanced civilizations may periodically arise and fall throughout our galaxy, but this may be such a rare event, relatively speaking, that the odds of two or more such civilizations existing at the same time are low. There may have been intelligent civilizations in the galaxy before the emergence of intelligence on Earth, and there may be intelligent civilizations after its extinction, but it is possible that human beings are the only intelligent civilization in existence now. The term "now" is somewhat complicated by the finite speed of light and the nature of spacetime under relativity. Assuming that an extraterrestrial intelligence is not able to travel to our vicinity at faster-than-light speeds, in order to detect an intelligence 1,000 light-years distant, that intelligence will need to have been active 1,000 years ago. Strictly speaking, only the portions of the universe lying within the past light cone of Earth need be considered, since any civilizations outside it could not be detected.

A related argument holds that other civilizations exist, and are transmitting and exploring, but their signals and probes simply have not arrived yet.[52] However, critics have noted that this is unlikely, since it requires we are at a very special point in time, when the galaxy is transitioning from empty to full. This particular portion is just a tiny fraction of the life of a galaxy, so the odds we exist at such a moment are low.[53]
[edit] It is too expensive to spread physically throughout the galaxy
See also: Project Daedalus, Project Orion (nuclear propulsion), and Project Longshot

Many assumptions about the ability of an alien culture to colonize other stars are based on the idea that interstellar travel is technologically feasible. While the current understanding of physics rules out the possibility of faster than light travel, it appears that there are no major theoretical barriers to the construction of "slow" interstellar ships. This idea underlies the concept of the Von Neumann probe and the Bracewell probe as evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence.

It is possible, however, that present scientific knowledge cannot properly gauge the feasibility and costs of such interstellar colonization. Theoretical barriers may not yet be understood and the cost of materials and energy for such ventures may be so high as to make it unlikely that any civilization could afford to attempt it. Even if interstellar travel and colonization are possible, they may be difficult, leading to a colonization model based on percolation theory.[54] Colonization efforts may not occur as an unstoppable rush, but rather as an uneven tendency to "percolate" outwards, within an eventual slowing and termination of the effort given the enormous costs involved and the fact that colonies will inevitably develop a culture and civilization of their own. Colonization may thus occur in "clusters," with large areas remaining uncolonized at any one time.

A similar argument holds that interstellar physical travel may be possible, but is much more expensive than interstellar communication. Furthermore, to an advanced civilization, travel itself may be replaced by communication, through mind uploading and similar technologies.[55] Therefore the first civilization may have physically explored or colonized the galaxy, but subsequent civilizations find it cheaper, faster, and easier to travel and get information through contacting existing civilizations rather than physically exploring or traveling themselves. In this scenario, since there is little or no physical travel, and directed communications are hard to see except to the intended receiver, there could be many technical and interacting civilizations with few signs visible across interstellar distances.
[edit] Human beings have not been searching long enough

Humanity's ability to detect and comprehend intelligent extraterrestrial life has existed for only a very brief period — from 1937 onwards, if the invention of the radio telescope is taken as the dividing line — and Homo sapiens is a geologically recent species. The whole period of modern human existence to date (about 200,000 years) is a very brief period on a cosmological scale, while radio transmissions have only been propagated since 1895. Thus it remains possible that human beings have neither been searching long enough to find other intelligences, nor been in existence long enough to be found.

One million years ago there would have been no humans for any extraterrestrial emissaries to meet. For each further step back in time, there would have been increasingly fewer indications to such emissaries that intelligent life would develop on Earth. In a large and already ancient universe, a space-faring alien species may well have had many other more promising worlds to visit and revisit. Even if alien emissaries visited in more recent times, they may have been interpreted by early human cultures as supernatural entities.

This hypothesis is more plausible if alien civilizations tend to stagnate or die out, rather than expand. In addition, "the probability of a site never being visited, even [with an] infinite time limit, is a non-zero value."[56] Thus, even if intelligent life expands elsewhere, it remains statistically possible that such extraterrestrial life might never discover Earth.
[edit] Communication is impossible for technical reasons
[edit] Humans are not listening properly

There are some assumptions that underlie the SETI search programs that may cause searchers to miss signals that are present. For example, the radio searches to date would completely miss highly compressed data streams (which would be almost indistinguishable from "white noise" to anyone who did not understand the compression algorithm). Extraterrestrials might also use frequencies that scientists have decided are unlikely to carry signals, or do not penetrate our atmosphere, or use modulation strategies that are not being looked for. The signals might be at a datarate that is too fast for our electronics to handle, or too slow to be recognised as attempts at communication. "Simple" broadcast techniques might be employed, but sent from non-main sequence stars which are searched with lower priority; current programs assume that most alien life will be orbiting Sun-like stars.[57]

The greatest problem is the sheer size of the radio search needed to look for signals (effectively spanning the entire visible universe), the limited amount of resources committed to SETI, and the sensitivity of modern instruments. SETI estimates, for instance, that with a radio telescope as sensitive as the Arecibo Observatory, Earth's television and radio broadcasts would only be detectable at distances up to 0.3 light years.[58] Clearly detecting an Earth type civilization at great distances is difficult. A signal is much easier to detect if the signal energy is focused in either a narrow range of frequencies (Narrowband transmissions), and/or directed at a specific part of the sky. Such signals can be detected at ranges of hundreds to tens of thousands of light-years distance.[59] However this means that detectors must be listening to an appropriate range of frequencies, and be in that region of space to which the beam is being sent. Many SETI searches, starting with the venerable Project Cyclops, go so far as to assume that extraterrestrial civilizations will be broadcasting a deliberate signal (like the Arecibo message), in order to be found.

Thus to detect alien civilizations through their radio emissions, Earth observers either need more sensitive instruments or must hope for fortuitous circumstances: that the broadband radio emissions of alien radio technology are much stronger than our own; that one of SETI's programs is listening to the correct frequencies from the right regions of space; or that aliens are sending focused transmissions such as the Arecibo message in our general direction.
[edit] Civilizations only broadcast detectable radio signals for a brief period of time

It may be that alien civilizations are detectable through their radio emissions for only a short time, reducing the likelihood of spotting them. There are two possibilities in this regard: civilizations outgrow radio through technological advance or, conversely, resource depletion cuts short the time in which a species broadcasts.

The first idea, that civilizations advance beyond radio, is based in part on the "fiber optic objection": the use of high power radio with low-to-medium gain (i.e., non-directional) antennas for long-distance transmission is wasteful of spectrum, yet this "waste" is precisely what makes these systems conspicuous at interstellar distances. Humans are moving to directional or guided transmission channels such as electrical cables, optical fibers, narrow-beam microwave and lasers, and conventional radio with non-directional antennas is increasingly reserved for low-power, short-range applications such as cell phones and Wi-Fi networks. These signals are far less detectable from space. Analog television, developed in the mid-twentieth century, contains strong carriers to aid reception and demodulation. Carriers are spectral lines that are very easily detected yet do not convey any information beyond their highly artificial nature. Nearly every SETI project is looking for carriers for just this reason, and UHF TV carriers are the most conspicuous and artificial signals from Earth that could be detected at interstellar distances. But advances in technology are replacing analog TV with digital television which uses spectrum more efficiently precisely by eliminating or reducing components such as carriers that make them so conspicuous. Using our own experience as an example, we could set the date of radio-visibility for Earth as December 12, 1901, when Guglielmo Marconi sent radio signals from Cornwall, England, to Newfoundland, Canada.[60] Visibility is now ending, or at least becoming orders of magnitude more difficult, as analog TV is being phased out. And so, if our experience is typical, a civilization remains radio-visible for approximately a hundred years. So a civilization may have been very visible from 1325 to 1483, but we were just not listening at that time. This is essentially the solution, "Everyone is listening, no one is sending."

More hypothetically, advanced alien civilizations evolve beyond broadcasting at all in the electromagnetic spectrum and communicate by principles of physics we don't yet understand. Some scientists have hypothesized that advanced civilizations may send neutrino signals.[61] If such signals exist they could be detectable by neutrino detectors that are now under construction.[62] If stable wormholes could be created and used for communications then interstellar broadcasts would become largely redundant. Thus it may be that other civilizations would only be detectable for a relatively short period of time between the discovery of radio and the switch to more efficient technologies.

A different argument is that resource depletion will soon result in a decline in technological capability. Human civilization has been capable of interstellar radio communication for only a few decades and is already rapidly depleting fossil fuels and confronting possible problems such as peak oil. It may only be a few more decades before energy becomes too expensive, and the necessary electronics and computers too difficult to manufacture, for us to continue the search. If the same conditions regarding energy supplies hold true for other civilizations, then radio technology may be a short-lived phenomenon. Unless two civilizations happen to be near each other and develop the ability to communicate at the same time it would be virtually impossible for any one civilization to "talk" to another.

Critics of the resource depletion argument point out that alternate energy sources exist, such as solar power, which are renewable and have enormous potential relative to technical barriers.[63] For depletion of fossil fuels to end the "technological phase" of a civilization, some form of technological regression would have to invariably occur, preventing the exploitation of renewable energy sources.
[edit] They tend to experience a technological singularity
See also: Sentience Quotient and Matrioshka brain

Another possibility is that technological civilizations invariably experience a technological singularity and attain a posthuman (or more properly, post-biological) character. Theoretical civilizations of this sort may have altered drastically enough to render communication impossible. The intelligences of a post-singularity civilization might require more information exchange than is possible through interstellar communication, for example. Or perhaps any information humanity might provide would appear elementary, and thus they do not try to communicate, any more than human beings attempt to talk to ants—even though we do ascribe a form of intelligence to them. From an evolutionary perspective, accidental Turing Machines (such as humans) and artificial Turing Machines (such as computers) would have nothing to discuss, since their evolutionary timescales are too different.

Even more extreme forms of post-singularity have been suggested, particularly in fiction: beings that divest themselves of physical form, create massive artificial virtual environments, transfer themselves into these environments through mind uploading, and exist totally within virtual worlds, ignoring the external physical universe. Surprisingly early treatments, such as Lewis Padgett's short story Mimsy were the Borogoves (1943), suggest a migration of advanced beings out of the presently known physical universe into a different and presumably more agreeable alternative one.

One version of this perspective, which makes predictions for future SETI findings of transcension "fossils" and includes a variation of the Zoo hypothesis below, has been proposed by singularity scholar John Smart.[64]
[edit] The evidence is being suppressed

It is theoretically possible that SETI groups are not reporting positive detections, or governments have been blocking extraterrestrial signals or suppressing publication of detections, perhaps in response to National Security and Trade Interests from the potential use of advanced extraterrestrial technology or weapons. It has been suggested that the detection of an extraterrestrial radio signal or technology could well be the most highly classified military information that exists.[65] Claims that this has already happened are common in the popular press [66][67] but absent in the scientific literature.
[edit] They choose not to interact with us
[edit] It is the nature of intelligent life to keep silent

It is possible that most civilizations keep the listen-only ideology: they make SETI, but do not make METI–the so-called SETI's Paradox.
[edit] Earth is purposely isolated (The zoo hypothesis)
An example of an artificial planetarium circumventing the solar system.
Main article: Zoo hypothesis

It is possible that the belief that alien races would communicate with the human species is merely an assumption, and that alien civilizations may not wish to communicate, even if they have the technical ability. A particular reason that alien civilizations may choose not to communicate is the so-called Zoo hypothesis: the idea that alien civilizations avoid contact with Earth so as not to interfere with our development, or to preserve an isolated "zoo or wilderness area".[68]

Many other reasons that an alien race might avoid contact have been proposed. Aliens might only choose to allow contact once the human race has passed certain ethical, political, or technological standards, e.g., ending poverty/war or being able to master interstellar travel. They may not want to interfere with our natural independent progress,[Note 6] or the Earth may have been set up as an explicit experiment that contact would ruin.[69]

These ideas are perhaps most plausible if there is a single alien civilization within contact range, or there is a relatively universal cultural or legal policy amongst more advanced lifeforms necessitating isolation with respect to civilizations at Earth-like stages of development. If there is a plurality of alien cultures, however, this theory may break down under the uniformity of motive flaw: all it takes is a single culture or civilization to decide to act contrary to the imperative within our range of detection for it to be abrogated, and the probability of such a violation increases with the number of civilizations.[11] This idea, and many others, becomes more plausible if we estimate that our galaxy has only a relatively small number of civilizations, or that all civilizations tend to evolve similar cultural values in regard to contact, or that all civilizations follow the lead of some particularly distinguished civilization (a hegemony).[citation needed]

A related idea is that the perceived universe is a simulated reality. The planetarium hypothesis[70] holds that beings may have simulated a universe for us that appears to be empty of other life, by design. The simulation argument[71] by Bostrom holds that although such a simulation may contain other life, such life cannot be much in advance of us since a far more advanced civilization may be correspondingly hard to simulate. If we treat this matter literally, then the truth is entirely inaccessible, there being an infinite regress problem (See Simulated reality). However, if we take as the material stratum of the simulation to be more local and somewhat metaphorical in relationship to what constitutes a computer, a possibility still exists of our being part of a kind of simulation involving the effective externally driven management of everything that we are able to perceive. This entails the simulating intelligence(s) coming from within the universe we can know and acting to exert a maximal control over its accessible domain(s) in ways suggested above. From this perspective, first of all, there would not be a limitation on civilization complexity and advancement because the (quasi-)simulating civilization would be free at least itself to advance, and, second of all, as the objects of the simulation, we might be constrained to passing through some phase before being allowed access to the facts (rather than either being either fully in control of our own discoveries or permanently held at bay from them).
[edit] It is dangerous to communicate

An alien civilization might feel it is too dangerous to communicate, either for us or for them. After all, when very different civilizations have met on Earth, the results have often been disastrous for one side or the other, and the same may well apply to interstellar contact.[72] Even contact at a safe distance could lead to infection by computer code[73] or even ideas themselves (see meme). Perhaps prudent civilizations actively hide not only from us but from everyone, out of fear of other civilizations.

Perhaps the Fermi paradox itself—or the alien equivalent of it—is the ultimate reason for any civilization to avoid contact with other civilizations, even if no other obstacles existed. From any one civilization's point of view, it would be unlikely for them to be the first ones to make first contact and therefore likely for them to face the same possibly fatal problems that supposedly prevented the earlier civilizations from contacting them. So perhaps every civilization keeps quiet because of the possibility that there is a real reason for others to do so.
[edit] They are too alien

Another possibility is that human theoreticians have underestimated how much alien life might differ from that on Earth. Alien psychologies may simply be too different to communicate with human beings—or even to understand the concept of communication—and they are unable or unwilling to make the attempt. Human mathematics, language, tool use, and other concepts and communicative capacity may be parochial to Earth and not shared by other life.[74]

For example, in Contact, Carl Sagan briefly speculated that an alien species might have a thought process orders of magnitude slower (or faster) than humans. Such a species could conceivably speak so slowly that it requires years to say even a simple phrase like "Hello". A message broadcast by that species might well seem like random background noise to humans, and therefore go undetected.
[edit] They are non-technological

It is not clear that a civilization of intelligent beings must be technological. If alien species do not develop technology, because it is difficult in its environment, because it chooses not to, or for any other reason, they will be very hard for human beings to detect.[75] Intelligence alone, as opposed to life, is not necessarily visible across interstellar distances. While there are remote sensing techniques which could perhaps detect life-bearing planets, none of them has any ability to distinguish intelligent but non-technical life from non-intelligent life. Not even any theoretical methods for doing so have been proposed, short of an actual physical visit by an astronaut or probe. This is sometimes referred to as the "algae vs. alumnae" problem.[75]
[edit] They are here unobserved

It may be that intelligent alien life forms not only exist, but are already present here on Earth. They are not detected because they do not wish it, human beings are technically unable to, or because societies refuse to admit to the evidence.[76] Several variations of this idea have been proposed:

Carl Sagan and Iosif Shklovsky[77] argued for serious consideration of "paleocontact" with extraterrestrials in the early historical era, and for examination of myths and religious lore for evidence of such contact. Many religions cite "deities" from the heavens with great powers unknown to man. Old Testament stories of Gabriel's trumpet, and the giving of laws to Moses, might hypothetically reflect alien efforts to guide or assist primitive man. In this view, there is in fact ample evidence of alien visitation. It is simply ignored out of habit, or because of the sacred religious traditions that have grown around those incidents.

It is possible that a life form technologically advanced enough to travel to Earth might also be sufficiently advanced to exist here undetected. In this view, the aliens have arrived on Earth, or in our solar system, and are observing the planet, while concealing their presence. Observation could conceivably be conducted in a number of ways that would be very difficult to detect. For example, a complex system of microscopic monitoring devices constructed via molecular nanotechnology could be deployed on Earth and remain undetected, or sophisticated instruments could conduct passive monitoring from elsewhere.

Mainstream scientific publications have occasionally addressed the possibility of extraterrestrial contact,[78] but the scientific community in general has given little serious attention to claims of unidentified flying objects. UFO researchers[79] argue that evidence supports the reality of UFOs as anomalies but does not necessarily support an extraterrestrial origin, and that closer examination of UFO data may confirm or falsify the Fermi paradox and/or the extraterrestrial hypothesis.

This hypothesis was jokingly suggested in response to Fermi's paradox by his fellow physicist, Leó Szilárd, who suggested to Fermi that extraterrestrials "are already among us — but they call themselves Hungarians",[80][81] a humorous reference to the peculiar Hungarian language, unrelated to most other languages spoken in Europe.[80][Note 7]
[edit] See also

* Fermi problem
* Anthropic principle
* Interstellar travel
* Rare Earth Hypothesis
* The Drake Equation
* Zoo hypothesis

[edit] Notes

1. ^ The Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev has stated that an alien civilization on Kardashev scale of 3 could send signals up to 10 billion light years.
2. ^ Let N(r) be the number of civilizations (per unit volume) that can be seen at a radius r. Let Rg be the radius of the galaxy. So the number of civilizations we see is:

\int_0^{R_g} N(r) 4 \pi r^2\,dr + \int_{R_g}^\infty N(r) 4 \pi r^2 \,dr

where the first integral are those in the galaxy, and the second those outside. Which integral is bigger depends on how fast N(r) decreases, which is completely unknown. This observation is due to Kardashev.
3. ^ Note that, even though there is at least one civilization in our galaxy (namely our own), the average or "most likely" number of civilizations in our galaxy as described by this equation may still be smaller than one. In other words, the fact that there is at least one civilization in our galaxy does not mean that this was a likely outcome. This is an example of anthropic bias. No civilization can use itself to estimate the average number of civilizations in a galaxy, since if there was not at least one civilization the question could not arise. The Drake equation computes only the long-term average number of civilizations; even if the average number of civilizations per galaxy is less than one, there could be more than one in any given galaxy at any given time.
4. ^ An example of fears of civilization destroying physics experiments. This particular fear (particle colliders creating black holes, destroying the false vacuum, etc.) is discounted among scientists, since cosmic rays of much higher energy have been striking the Earth and moon for eons (NYT article, Technical report). But the general concern is valid.
5. ^ a b See, for example, Berserker (Saberhagen), The Heechee Saga (Pohl), Revelation Space (Reynolds)
6. ^ For an example from popular culture, see the Prime Directive of Star Trek
7. ^ See, for example, George Marx's 1995 lecture, "Conflicts and Creativity — The Hungarian Lesson", which was based on his 1994 book, The Voice of the Martians, Roland Eötvös Physical Society ISBN 9630574276, and his article Marx, George (1996). "The myth of the martians and the golden age of Hungarian science". Science & Education 5: 225. doi:10.1007/BF00414313.

[edit] References

1. ^ Sagan, Carl Cosmos, Random House 2002 ISBN 0375508325
2. ^ Wesson, Paul (1990). "Cosmology, extraterrestrial intelligence, and a resolution of the Fermi-Hart paradox". Royal Astronomical Society, Quarterly Journal 31: 161–170. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1990QJRAS..31..161W. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
3. ^ a b Brin, Glen David (1983). "The 'Great Silence': The Controversy Concerning Extraterrestial Intelligent Life". Quarterly Journal of Royal Astronomical Society 24: 283–309. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1983QJRAS..24..283B. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
4. ^ James Annis (1999). "An Astrophysical Explanation for the Great Silence". arΧiv:astro-ph/9901322 [astro-ph].
5. ^ a b Hanson, Robin (1998). "The Great Filter — Are We Almost Past It?". http://hanson.gmu.edu/greatfilter.html.
6. ^ Bostrom, Nick (2007). In Great Silence there is Great Hope. http://www.nickbostrom.com/papers/fermi.pdf. Retrieved 2010-09-06.
7. ^ a b Milan M. Ćirković (2009). "Fermi's Paradox - The Last Challenge for Copernicanism?". arΧiv:0907.3432 [astro-ph].
8. ^ Lem, Stanisław (1983). His Master's Voice. Harvest Books. ISBN 0-15-640300-5. http://books.google.com/?id=I5gYWtcfMioC&lpg=PA73&dq=%22silentium%20universi%22%20lem&pg=PA73#v=onepage&q=.
9. ^ "NASA - Galaxy". Nasa.gov. November 29, 2007. http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/galaxy_worldbook.html. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
10. ^ Craig, Andrew (July 22, 2003). "Astronomers count the stars". BBC News (BBC). http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3085885.stm. Retrieved April 8, 2010.
11. ^ a b Crawford, I.A., "Where are They? Maybe we are alone in the galaxy after all", Scientific American, July 2000, 38–43, (2000).
12. ^ Shklovskii, I. S.; Sagan, Carl (1966). Intelligent Life in the Universe. San Francisco: Holden–Day. p. 394. ISBN 0330251252
13. ^ Dunne, Alan (1950). "Uncaptioned cartoon". New Yorker, 20 May 1950. http://home.fnal.gov/~carrigan/pillars/New_Yorker_aliens.png. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
14. ^ a b Jones, Eric "Where is everybody?", An account of Fermi's question", Los Alamos Technical report LA-10311-MS, March, 1985.
15. ^ Shostak, Seth (October 25, 2001). "Our Galaxy Should Be Teeming With Civilizations, But Where Are They?". Space.com. Space.com. http://www.space.com/searchforlife/shostak_paradox_011024.html. Retrieved April 8, 2006.
16. ^ Cohen, Jack and Stewart, Ian (2002). Evolving the Alien. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. ISBN 0091879272. Chapter 6, What does a Martian look like?.
17. ^
[Edit this reference]
Barrow, John D.; Tipler, Frank J. (19 May 1988). The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. foreword by John A. Wheeler. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 588. LC 87-28148. ISBN 9780192821478. http://books.google.com/books?id=uSykSbXklWEC&printsec=frontcover. Retrieved 31 December 2009.
18. ^ Gowdy, Robert H., VCU Department of Physics SETI: Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence. The Interstellar Distance Problem, 2008
19. ^ See, for example, the SETI Institute, The Harvard SETI Home Page, or The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence at Berkeley
20. ^ Schmidt, Stanley (1976). Sins of Our Fathers. Berkeley.
21. ^ "NASA/CP2007-214567: Workshop Report on the Future of Intelligence In The Cosmos". NASA. http://event.arc.nasa.gov/main/home/reports/CP2007-214567_Langhoff.pdf.
22. ^ Mullen, Leslie (2002). "Alien Intelligence Depends on Time Needed to Grow Brains". Astrobiology Magazine. Space.com. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/alien_intelligence_021202.html. Retrieved April 21, 2006.
23. ^ "Habitable Planet Signposts". Astrobiology magazine. June 16, 2009. http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=2085&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
24. ^ Chauvin, G. et al. (2004). "A giant planet candidate near a young brown dwarf". Astronomy & Astrophysics 425: L29–L32. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200400056.
25. ^ Schneider, Jean (January 20, 2010). "Interactive Extra-solar Planets Catalog". The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia. http://exoplanet.eu/. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
26. ^ Udry, S.; Bonfils, X.; Delfosse, X.; Forveille, T.; Mayor, M.; Perrier, C.; Bouchy, F.; Lovis, C. et al. (2007). "The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets". Astronomy and Astrophysics 469: L43. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077612. http://exoplanet.eu/papers/udry_terre_HARPS-1.pdf.
27. ^ Papagiannis, M. D. (1978). "Are We all Alone, or could They be in the Asteroid Belt?". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 19: 277–281. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1978QJRAS..19..277P. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
28. ^ Bracewell, R. N. (1960). "Communications from Superior Galactic Communities". Nature 186: 670. doi:10.1038/186670a0.
29. ^ "SETV projects". Setv.org. February 21, 2009. http://www.setv.org/. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
30. ^ Freitas, Robert A, Jr; Valdes, F (1985). "The search for extraterrestrial artifacts (SETA)☆". Acta Astronautica 12: 1027. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(85)90031-1. http://www.setv.org/online_mss/seta83.html. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
31. ^ Dyson, Freeman J. (1960). "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infra-Red Radiation". Science 131 (3414): 1667–1668. doi:10.1126/science.131.3414.1667. PMID 17780673. http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/SETI1.HTM.
32. ^ Niven, Larry, "Bigger than Worlds", Analog, March 1974.
33. ^ Amir Alexander (23 March 2004). "Can a Star's Glow Reveal an Advanced Civilization?". Planetary Society. http://www.planetary.org/news/2004/0323_Can_a_Stars_Glow_Reveal_an_Advanced.html.
34. ^ "Fermilab Dyson Sphere search program". Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. http://home.fnal.gov/~carrigan/infrared_astronomy/Fermilab_search.htm. Retrieved February 10, 2008.
35. ^ Burchell, M.J. (2006). "W (h) ither the Drake equation?". International Journal of Astrobiology (Cambridge Univ Press) 5 (03): 243–250. doi:10.1017/S1473550406003107.
36. ^ a b Ward, Peter D.; Brownlee, Donald (January 14, 2000). Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe (1st ed.). Springer. p. 368. ISBN 978-0387987019.
37. ^ Andreadis, Athena "E. T., Call Springer-Verlag!" SETI League Publications, 2000.
38. ^ Nealson, K.H. and Conrad, P.G. (1999). "Life: past, present and future.". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (The Royal Society) 354 (1392): 1923. doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0532. PMID 10670014.
39. ^ Bounama, C. and von Bloh, W. and Franck, S. (2007). "How Rare Is Complex Life in the Milky Way?". Astrobiology (Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.) 7 (5): 745–756. doi:10.1089/ast.2006.0084. PMID 17963474.
40. ^ Bostrom, Nick. "Existential Risks Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards". http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.html. Retrieved October 4, 2009.
41. ^ Darling, David. "Extraterrestrial intelligence, hazards to". The Encyclopedia of Astrobiology, Astronomy, and Spaceflight. Worlds of David Darling. http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/E/etcivhaz.html. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
42. ^ Hawking, Stephen. "Life in the Universe". Public Lectures. University of Cambridge. Archived from the original on April 21, 2006. http://web.archive.org/web/20060421051343/http://www.hawking.org.uk/lectures/life.html. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
43. ^ Soter, Steven (2005). "SETI and the Cosmic Quarantine Hypothesis". Astrobiology Magazine. Space.com. http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1745. Retrieved May 3, 2006.
44. ^ Archer, Michael (1989). "Slime Monsters Will Be Human Too". Aust. Nat. Hist 22: 546–547.
45. ^ Webb, p. 112
46. ^ Melott, A.L. and Lieberman, BS and Laird, CM and Martin, LD and Medvedev, MV and Thomas, BC and Cannizzo, JK and Gehrels, N. and Jackman, CH (2004). "Did a gamma-ray burst initiate the late Ordovician mass extinction?". International Journal of Astrobiology (Cambridge Univ Press) 3 (01): 55–61. doi:10.1017/S1473550404001910. http://acdb-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/People/Jackman/Melott_2004.pdf.
47. ^ Nick Bostrom, Milan M. Ćirković. Global catastrophic risks. Section 12.5 - The Fermi Paradox and Mass Extinctions.
48. ^ Wiker, Benjamin D. (2002). "Christianity and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life". crisismagazine.com. http://catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0591.html.
49. ^ Gonzalez, Guillermo and Richards, Jay W. (2004). The Privileged Planet. Regnery Publishing. p. 306. ISBN 0895260654. http://books.google.com/books?id=KFdu4CyQ1k0C&pg=PA306.
50. ^ Webb, pp. 62–71
51. ^ Vakoch, Douglas. "Decoding E.T.: Ancient Tongues Point Way To Learning Alien Languages". SETI Institute. http://www.space.com/searchforlife/seti_decode_011115.html. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
52. ^ Newman, W.T. and Sagan, C. (1981). "Galactic civilizations: Population. dynamics and interstellar diffusion". Icarus 46: 293–327. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(81)90135-4.
53. ^ Brin, Glen David (1983). "The 'Great Silence': The Controversy Concerning Extraterrestial Intelligent Life". Quarterly Journal of Royal Astronomical Society 24: 287, 298. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1983QJRAS..24..283B. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
54. ^ Landis, Geoffrey (1998). "The Fermi Paradox: An Approach Based on Percolation Theory". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 51: 163–166. http://www.sff.net/people/Geoffrey.Landis/percolation.htp.
55. ^ Scheffer, L.K. (1994). "Machine Intelligence, the Cost of Interstellar Travel and Fermi's Paradox". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 35: 157. http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1994QJRAS..35..157S. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
56. ^ Kinouchi, Osame (December 2001). Persistence solves Fermi Paradox but challenges SETI projects. http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0112137. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
57. ^ Turnbull, Margaret C.; Tarter, Jill C. (2003). "Target Selection for SETI. I. A Catalog of Nearby Habitable Stellar Systems". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 145: 181. doi:10.1086/345779. http://www.projectrho.com/HabCat.pdf. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
58. ^ "''SETI's FAQ,'' Sec 1.2.3". Setifaq.org. November 2003. http://setifaq.org/faq.html#1.2.3. Retrieved July 3, 2010.
59. ^ "SETI's FAQ, Sec 1.6". Setifaq.org. November 2003. http://setifaq.org/faq.html#1.6. Retrieved July 3, 2010.
60. ^ Anonymous (December, 2001). "BBC — Cornwall — Marconi 100". Bbc.co.uk. http://www.bbc.co.uk/cornwall/marconi/marconibg.shtml. Retrieved July 3, 2010.
61. ^ "Cosmic Search Vol. 1 No. 3". Bigear.org. September 21, 2004. http://www.bigear.org/vol1no3/neutrino.htm. Retrieved July 3, 2010.
62. ^ Learned, J; Pakvasa, S; Zee, A (2009). "Galactic neutrino communication". Physics Letters B 671: 15. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.057. http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2429.
63. ^ Smith, Charles (July 1995). "History of Solar Energy". Technology Review: Solar Power. Archived from the original on 2008-02-25. http://web.archive.org/web/20080225114548/http://www.solarenergy.com/info_history.html.
64. ^ Smart, John, "Answering the Fermi Paradox: Exploring the Mechanisms of Universal Transcension", Journal of Evolution and Technology, June 2002.
65. ^ A. Tough (1990). "A critical examination of factors that might encourage secrecy.". Acta Astronautica (21,): pp. 97–102. doi:10.1016/0094-5765(90)90134-7.
66. ^ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/31/signals_seti/
67. ^ http://www.aolnews.com/weird-news/article/stanton-friedman-a-scientist-searches-for-the-truth-of-ufos/19503350
68. ^ Ball, J (1973). "The zoo hypothesis". Icarus 19: 347. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(73)90111-5.
69. ^ Knight-Jadczyk, Laura (2005). The High Strangeness of Dimensions, Densities, and the Process of Alien Abduction. Red Pill Press. p. 96. ISBN 1897244118. http://books.google.com/books?id=gwM-bsYGKkMC&pg=PA96.
70. ^ Baxter, Stephen (2001). "The Planetarium Hypothesis: A Resolution of the Fermi Paradox". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society 54 (5/6): 210–216. http://www.bis-spaceflight.com/sitesia.aspx/page/358/id/890/l/en.
71. ^ Bostrom, Nick (2003). "Are You Living In a Computer Simulation?". Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211): 243–255. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00309. http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html. ; See also this web site about the simulation argument.
72. ^ Brin, David. "A contrarian perspective on altruism: the dangers of first contact". http://www.setileague.org/iaaseti/brin.pdf. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
73. ^ Carrigan, Richard A. (2006). "Do potential SETI signals need to be decontaminated?". Acta Astronautica 58 (2): 112–117. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2005.05.004.
74. ^ Schombert, James. "Fermi's paradox (i.e. Where are they?)" Lectures, University of Oregon.
75. ^ a b Tarter, Jill (2006). "What is SETI?a". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 950: 269. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb02144.x. PMID 11797755.
76. ^ Webb, pp. 27–60
77. ^ Shklovskii, I. S.; Sagan, Carl (1966). Intelligent Life in the Universe. San Francisco: Holden–Day. ISBN 189280302X.
78. ^ Steel, D. (1995). "SETA and 1991 VG". The Observatory 115: 78–83. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.setv.org%2Fonline_mss%2F1991vg.pdf&ei=JOdsTIWOKIrQcfug-IgN&usg=AFQjCNHuVx-e3yRU4yorgLzuIsUO7qLqBw. Retrieved August 19, 2010.
79. ^ Swords, Michael D. "The Extraterrestrial Hypothesis and Science", pp. 368–373 in Jerome Clark's The UFO Encyclopedia: The Phenomenon from the Beginning. 2nd edition. 1998. Omingraphics. ISBN 0-7808-0097-4
80. ^ a b Webb, p. 28
81. ^ Crick, Francis (1981). Life Itself. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 0671255622.

[edit] Bibliography

* Webb, Stephen (2002). If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens... Where Is Everybody?. Copernicus Books. ISBN 0-387-95501-1. http://books.google.com/books?id=-vZ0BVSHix4C&printsec=frontcover.

[edit] Further reading

* Ben Zuckerman and Michael H. Hart, Extraterrestrials: Where Are They? ISBN 0-521-44803-4 Amazon
* Savage, Marshall T. (1992). The Millennial Project: Colonizing the Galaxy in 8 Easy Steps. Denver: Empyrean Publishing. ISBN 0-9633914-8-8.
* Michaud, Michael (2006). Contact with Alien Civilizations: Our Hopes and Fears about Encountering Extraterrestrials. Copernicus Books. ISBN 978-0387-28598-6.
* Gold, Thomas (1998). The Deep Hot Biosphere. Springer. ISBN 978-0387952536.
* Evolving the Alien: The Science of Extraterrestrial Life
* Documentary "Overcome the Great Silence!"

[edit] External links
Listen to this article (3 parts) · (info)
Part 1 • Part 2 • Part 3
This audio file was created from a revision of Fermi paradox dated 2008-05-29, and does not reflect subsequent edits to the article. (Audio help)
More spoken articles
Sound-icon.svg

* SMBC
* Interstellar Radio Messages
* Exotic Civilizations: Possible Answer to Fermi's Paradox by Paul Hughes
* Introduction and Drake equations for the Fermi paradox
* So much space, so little time: why aliens haven't found us yet by Ian Sample,The Guardian January 18, 2007
* The Possibilities of FTL: Or Fermi's Paradox Reconsidered by F.E. Freiheit IV
* Fermi's Paradox (i.e. Where are They?) by James Schombert
* Life in the Universe, by Eric Schulman, Mercury Magazine (May/June to November/December 2000)
* Answering the Fermi Paradox: Exploring the Mechanisms of Universal Transcension by John Smart
* Extraterrestrial Intelligence in the Solar System: Resolving the Fermi Paradox, which argues that our observations are incomplete, and There Is No Fermi Paradox, arguing that the paradox is based on a logical flaw, both by Robert Freitas
* Fermi Paradox debate Astrobiology Magazine July 2002. Michael Meyer, Frank Drake, Christopher McKay, Donald Brownlee, & David Grinspoon.
* The Fermi Paradox: Back With a Vengeance by George Dvorsky.
* Virtual Reality Could Explain the Fermi Paradox by Michael Graham Richard
* A list of possible answers to the Fermi paradox (with references to published works discussing some of these options) by Anders Sandberg

73 es 55